They’re all counted, okay that is probably not the case but it is damn near the case. And even considering the Electoral College’s effect of twisting the peoples input a bit, couldn’t it be overcome, and very possibly would be, if people opted to vote. Jason and Dumpty, other than the Electoral College, how are our national elections a scam. 2016 US Presidential Electoral Map If Only Votedįind this map interesting? The please help us by sharing it:.Counties That Changed Party In The 2016 US Presidential Election VS 2012.How Whites Voted In The 2016 US Presidential Election by State & County.2016 US Presidential Election Map By County & Vote Share.In the other 6 states listed above, victories were simple pluralities. Washington DC is the only area in the country where a majority of all eligible voters (whether they voted or not) voted for Clinton ( 90% of voters, voted for Clinton on a 55.7% turnout).As a percentage of the entire US population (including those too young or other ineligible to vote) Clinton got votes from 20.30% of the population and Trump got votes from 19.41% of people.Neither Candidate even won a majority of votes cast, Clinton got 48.0% vs Trump’s 45.9%.Donald Trump received 2,046,656 more votes than Romney did in 2012, but Hilary Clinton received 70,732 fewer votes than Obama did in 2012.It is the 5th election since 1820 when the winner of the popular vote lost the presidency (the others being 1824, 1876, 1888, and 2000).Total voter turnout was estimated to be 55.3% of the voting age population and 59.0% of the voting eligible population.Iowa and Wisconsin for Trump and Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire and DC for Clinton. Only 8 states + Washington DC, had high enough voter turnouts where one of the actual candidates won more votes than people who did not bother to vote. Totals below were true at the time of writing but may no longer currently be accurate as additional votes and recounts are conducted. The map above shows what the 2016 US Presidential Election results would have been if votes not cast for Hillary, Trump or one of the third party candidates had gone to fictional candidate “Did Not Vote.”ĭisclaimer: The map above was accurate as of January 17th, 2017. Due to faithless voting, the electoral votes for Washington were: for President, Clinton 8, Colin Powell 3, and Faith Spotted Eagle 1 for Vice President, Kaine 8, Elizabeth Warren 1, Susan Collins 1, Maria Cantwell 1, and Winona LaDuke 1.Map created using 270 To Win, based on reddit user Taillesskangaru’s posts here and updated here.
****Washington does not appoint its electors proportionally. Due to faithless voting, the electoral votes for Texas were: for President, Trump 36, Ron Paul 1, and John Kasich 1 for Vice President, Pence 37 and Carly Fiorina 1. ***Texas does not appoint its electors proportionally. Maine's electoral votes were proportionally awarded accordingly: for President, Clinton 3 and Trump 1 for Vice President, Kaine 3 and Pence 1. Clinton/Kaine won in the First Congressional District and took the state Trump/Pence won the Second Congressional District. **Maine appoints its electors proportionally. Due to faithless voting, the electoral votes for Hawaii were: for President, Clinton 3 and Bernie Sanders 1 for Vice President, Kaine 3 and Elizabeth Warren 1. *Hawaii does not appoint its electors proportionally. Click on the number of electoral votes for each State to see its Certificate of Vote.Click on the name of a State to see its Certificate of Ascertainment.There were faithless votes cast for president and vice president in Hawaii, Texas, and Washington.Įlectoral College Certificates and Votes by State For the first time since adopting this system, Maine's four electoral votes were split between the two major party tickets. Maine distributes its electoral votes proportionally by Congressional district, with two at-large electors representing the statewide winning presidential and vice presidential candidates and one elector each representing the winners from its two Congressional districts.
0 kommentar(er)
